This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Cached(?) pages when not-logged-in sometimes appear to be very seriously out-of-date
by stevieb (Canon) on Oct 12, 2015 at 21:27 UTC

    Do you have any specific node examples or scenarios that can be tested/repro'd?

      Ah! Ha-ha-ha!!! Oh, heh. Haha, ha... oh, oh, you! ++ for the power of positive thinking and following up on help desk requests.

      $ curl -I http://perlmonks.org/?node=Recently+Active+Threads 2>/dev/nu +ll | egrep -i 'date|cache|modified' Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:43:54 GMT $ curl -I http://perlmonks.org/?node=Recently+Active+Threads 2>/dev/nu +ll | egrep -i 'date|cache|modified' Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:43:57 GMT $ curl -I http://perlmonks.org/?node=Newest+Nodes 2>/dev/null | egrep +-i 'date|cache|modified' Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:44:07 GMT $ curl -I http://perlmonks.org/?node=Newest+Nodes 2>/dev/null | egrep +-i 'date|cache|modified' Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:44:09 GMT
        At least I didn't ask "did you turn it off and back on again?" :)
Re: Cached(?) pages when not-logged-in sometimes appear to be very seriously out-of-date
by jdporter (Paladin) on Oct 15, 2015 at 18:49 UTC
    I lately observe that the content is often many days(!) out-of-date ... until I log in...

    I don't know if the problem is on your end, or somewhere in between, but it's not on our end, because PM doesn't cache any output. (There are a few pages which are "cached", such as Selected Best Nodes, but you don't seem to be talking about any of those.)

    If you would like to take some screen shots the next time you see it happen, and send them to me, I'd be happy to take a look.

Re: Cached(?) pages when not-logged-in sometimes appear to be very seriously out-of-date
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 12, 2015 at 23:35 UTC
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.