in reply to The Cookies account

So, if anything happened to me, would there be someone who would be willing to take over this very silly account?

I guess that yes. Those of course are people you trust, but you don't know who wins the race towards the end. You can ask monks of your choice via private message (/msg nick message in the CB) if they volunteer and pass them the credentials by some chosen way. OTOH, I don't know the site policy regarding multiple access to a single account, as opposed to one person ruling multiple accounts.

A note of one of the gods would be helpful in this regard.

perl -le'print map{pack c,($-++?1:13)+ord}split//,ESEL'

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: The Cookies account
by jdporter (Paladin) on Apr 26, 2017 at 23:37 UTC

    Having more than one real person have login access to an account is in general a bad idea. It's about attributability, which is to say, accountability. If something is done in the context of that account, which human gets the blame? That being said, there's very little harm an ordinary user account can do. And we have ways of restricting secondary accounts even further, so there is really very little concern. That being said -- I don't believe LA has any reason to worry about what happens to that secondary account in the event of her demise. No one really cares about it. And if that should happen, we can pick an interested monk (if any) to take ownership of it at that time.

    I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
[reply]
      Or you can just let it sit as-is? I mean if the owner can't be arsed to sort it out himself it doesn't need sorting
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion