Re: Re: CPAN Module Naming Suggestions.

Thanks for the suggestion. I'm kind of stuck on the findone part of the name.
(I should have been more clear in my original post. I was thinking more of the toplevel namespace.)
While it may sound stubborn, but the whole purpose of making this construct (for me) was it was in a proprietary LISP'ish' type language that I used to use and I missed it. (About the only thing I did miss.) The construct just fits the way I think logic.

-Lee

"To be civilized is to deny one's nature."

Comment on Re: Re: CPAN Module Naming Suggestions.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: CPAN Module Naming Suggestions. by Anonymous Monk on Mar 04, 2002 at 19:26 UTC
Why don't we just add this functionality to Set::Scalar or Set::Array? :)	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: CPAN Module Naming Suggestions. by shotgunefx (Parson) on Mar 05, 2002 at 01:31 UTC
I think Set::Array is for arrays that use OO-style methods. Findone doesn't. Actually one of the reasons it came about was seeing if I could make something work like a built-in with context info like between calls ///g without objects or closures. -Lee "To be civilized is to deny one's nature."	[reply]