in reply to (jeffa) Re: Regular Expressions: Call for Examples
in thread Regular Expressions: Call for Examples
I wrote this mostly to annoy jeffa because of:
they could be combined into one regexBut, he insisted that I post this here :)
$chunk =~ s! \[ (?(?= [^:]*://) (?: (\w+):// ([^|\]]+) (?: \| ([^\[]+) )? ) | (\w+) ) \] ! $_ = "<a href=\"".((defined$1)?(qq($TAG{$1}$2">).((defined$3)?$3:$2)): qq($TAG{DEFAULT}$4">$4))."</a>"!gex;
I truely think that jeffa's approach is better than the above. It's much smarter to break a 3 case problem into 3 steps rather than use 1 gigantic regex. Just look at the "substitution" section; its hidious (I'd normally have used a sub to handle the above "substitution" section, but then wouldn't be "one regex" :)
.
|
---|