Re: How to whore for XP
by Juerd (Abbot) on Sep 26, 2002 at 11:49 UTC
|
Use all your votes every day.
It's quite hard to cast 40 votes per day. And it's not worth the trouble.
Use those HTML tags.
But don't forget closing them, like you did (please add </ul>).
READMORE tags
That's not really html :)
I only need 50XP to make $LEVEL
Nahhh... 50 is too much. I'll gladly upvote if someone needs only 1 or 2 XP.
Lastly, write a meditation on how to XP whore ;p
No, we'd just blame them for copying your idea and downvote :)
- Yes, I reinvent wheels.
- Spam: Visit eurotraQ.
| [reply] [d/l] |
|
| [reply] |
|
Wow, that node sure has this one beat. It seemed a little more nefarious, however: "When you reach a sufficient level, use the moderation system for your plans. Put in the frontpage everything you write.", even if it did have "kidding" in the title.
| [reply] |
|
|
|
|
Re: How to whore for XP
by Mr. Muskrat (Canon) on Sep 26, 2002 at 13:51 UTC
|
XP is worthless.
I gain true experience by simply reading, testing and writing code.
| [reply] |
|
Also sprach Mr. Muskrat:
XP is worthless.
I quite agree; I've moved to OS X and I wouldn't go back.
(Okay, hands up all who saw that one coming down the pike ...)
--
tbone1
As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.
| [reply] |
|
| [reply] |
|
XP is worthless
This is really true. Every time I start seeing myself XP whoring I tend to remember the qoute "I am not a number, I am a free man" and start thinking about XP as just a number in the database (which is somehow sometimes controlling my mind... Need... more... XP...)
So XP is really just a number. However the knowledge that I have gained here is worth more than ability to vote or to put my picture on a homenode. Seriously.
| [reply] |
|
Well, of course it is. Doesn't learn you perl, and it doesn't make you a better person. But for those who like arbitrary numbers....
--
It's not pessimism if there is a worse option, it's not paranoia when they are and it's not cynicism when you're right.
| [reply] |
|
XP is worthless.
Not totally true. Whether you believe XP to be worthless or not, XP on a node can be a good deterent for not posting badly thought out answers, or stupid questions. If you're XP starts going backwards, you generally end up thinking things out more. Of course that would infer that you even pay attention to nodes that you reply to, or create.
Course I'm a hipocrite talking about how XP isn't totally worthless when I'm just too damn lazy to log (for months now) because I blast my cookies on a regular basis.
| [reply] |
|
You are also confusing a monk's XP with a node's reputation.
| [reply] |
Re: How to whore for XP
by ignatz (Vicar) on Sep 26, 2002 at 17:59 UTC
|
I am the KING OF XP WHORES! Bow down before your King!
Some of my secrets that have been missed so far:
- Write a sappy meditation praising Tilly.
- Know how to link. Why is this my highest rated node?
- Irony. My 2nd highest rated node is a masterpiece of irony. Note the rapid replies on a front-paged node.
- Avoid Perl. How the heck am I at almost 4000?
Seriously, I post because I have something to say and I like saying it here since I love the site. Now that I've learned the Secret Saint Handshake what more is there???
()-()
\"/
`
| [reply] |
Re: How to whore for XP
by shadox (Priest) on Sep 26, 2002 at 14:50 UTC
|
I agree with everyone who said that XP is worthless.
Yeah it is, but if you still want to make your tactics you missed one: To gain XP, don't talk about XP or how to gain it
___________________________________________
Optimus magister, bonus liber
| [reply] |
|
The first rule of XP Whoring is you don't talk about XP Whoring?
Sorry, couldn't help myself ;)
-- $rattusillegitimus = Eliza::PerlMonks::Robot::new()
| [reply] |
Re: How to whore for XP
by zentara (Cardinal) on Sep 26, 2002 at 16:30 UTC
|
I think the XP points will only be a useful guide, if they are handed out
sparingly. What will happen if everyone becomes a saint in a year's
time? Then it becomes meaningless. Maybe create the "uber-saint"?
Or Levels of "sainthood"?
This is starting to remind me of the "american public school system"
where you pass just for showing up, or college where you pass on
the curve as long as you pay tuition.
I would prefer it if being a saint really meant something. Like at least
5 years participation in perlmonks, and/or a vote amoung all the
current saints.
I vote for nodes that produce working code examples, and for
comments that reveal "deep perl clues" which can't be found in
the books.
| [reply] |
|
Nearly two years ago it was predicted that normal nodes would routinely be getting 300 votes "in one or two years" (by Ovid, I think? I searched, but unfortunately couldn't find anything), which would make the current rank levels meaningless and make reputations of nodes posted too long apart completely incomporable.
As you see, this hasn't come to pass.
There's two factors playing into this:
- The number of votes given out per day never changed.
- More users mean more posts.
Think about it.
Makeshifts last the longest.
| [reply] |
Re: How to whore for XP
by sauoq (Abbot) on Sep 26, 2002 at 20:34 UTC
|
Post early. Post often.
And forget releases... you won't have time for releasing anything once you register at the Monastery. ;-)
-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
| [reply] |
Re: How to whore for XP
by jmcnamara (Monsignor) on Sep 27, 2002 at 07:56 UTC
|
The problem with XP is the assumption that people with a lot of XP know what they are talking about.
The other problem with XP is the assumption by people with a lot of XP that they know what they are talking about. ;-)
--
John.
| [reply] |
XP is overused
by Jeppe (Monk) on Sep 27, 2002 at 13:34 UTC
|
For some reason, XP appears to be really overused. Windows XP, Office XP, AMD Athlon XP, XP points on Perlmonk. I find it confusing, if a mere Acolyte dare speak his mind.. Maybe we should come up with something more spiritual? 'insight', anyone? Or maybe 'enlightenment'.. Or maybe something more computer-related like 'level of grok'? | [reply] |
|
XP was used as a shorthand for eXperience Points in role-playing games long before Micro$oft had started to write Word for the Macintosh. In this case, the marketing twerps at M$ are just piggy-backing on the Gygeeks of those bygone days.
Nice to know some things never change, I guess.
--
tbone1
As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly.
| [reply] |