in reply to Re: CGI versus CGI::* modules
in thread CGI versus CGI::* modules
CGI was designed to be easy to implement.
So was HTML.
How does your hand-rolled implementation handle P3P cookies? While you're adding support for those, have you considered CGI::Pretty?
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: CGI versus CGI::* modules
by jonadab (Parson) on Aug 07, 2003 at 13:15 UTC | |
by chromatic (Archbishop) on Aug 07, 2003 at 16:45 UTC | |
by jonadab (Parson) on Aug 09, 2003 at 16:13 UTC | |
by jonadab (Parson) on Aug 09, 2003 at 15:47 UTC | |
by andye (Curate) on Sep 11, 2003 at 13:04 UTC | |
by jonadab (Parson) on Sep 11, 2003 at 15:51 UTC | |
|