Look at the official documentation:
"Returns the integer portion of EXPR"
That's incorrect and vague
At the very least, this documentation needs fixing - even if the underlying code is not getting touched.
In reply to Re^4: Weird behavior of int()
by cLive ;-)
in thread Weird behavior of int()
by cLive ;-)
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |