Thank you for generously suggesting different resources. And, yes, you have valid points and questions. They are all worth considering. I'm still learning that it takes a special way of looking at things when using an object-oriented style of programming. I'm afraid that my concept of class object has not fully evolved yet. It's hard to transition from the mundane concept of an object as a mere instance of a class to the concept that objects (even supposedly inanimate objects such as apple) could actually behave like living objects that bring forth methods or actions (i.e. saying "I am a red apple"). :)
In reply to Re^2: OOP's setter/getter method - is there a way to avoid them? ( what should be an object and what should it do)
by tiny_monk
in thread OOP's setter/getter method - is there a way to avoid them?
by tiny_monk
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |