#!/usr/bin/perl use Benchmark; timethese(10000, { 'foreachmy' => sub { my ($sum,$avg); foreach my $i (1..1000) { $sum += $i; $avg = $sum/$i; } }, 'foreachglobal' => sub { my ($sum,$avg,$i); foreach $i (1..1000) { $sum += $i; $avg = $sum/$i; } }, 'foreachnovar' => sub { my ($sum,$avg); foreach (1..1000) { $sum += $_; $avg = $sum/$_; } }, 'fornovar' => sub { my ($sum,$avg); for (1..1000) { $sum += $_; $avg = $sum/$_; } }, 'ctypeFor' => sub { my ($i,$sum,$avg); for ($i=1;$i<=1000;$i++) { $sum += $i; $avg = $sum/$i; } } } );
While I'm not so sure about the little difference between the foreachlocal and foreachmy result, the construct foreach local $i (.....) definitely seems to be faster than foreach (......) ... or am I doing something terrible to $_ IN the foreach block?Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of ctypeFor, foreachglobal, foreach +my, foreachnovar, fornovar... ctypeFor: 26 wallclock secs (26.27 usr + 0.00 sys = 26.27 CPU) foreachglobal: 22 wallclock secs (22.50 usr + 0.00 sys = 22.50 CPU) foreachmy: 23 wallclock secs (22.42 usr + 0.00 sys = 22.42 CPU) foreachnovar: 23 wallclock secs (23.33 usr + 0.00 sys = 23.33 CPU) fornovar: 24 wallclock secs (23.44 usr + 0.03 sys = 23.47 CPU)
In reply to Re: List processing performance
by vijeno
in thread List processing performance
by Odud
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |