"" "0" "00" "11" "000" "101" "0000" "1111" "1001" "1111" "00000" "10101"
I regret to inform you that 101 is not matched, though 110 and 011 are. (abell's solution is correct.)
I'm a bit gratified that people seem to be having a fairly difficult time with this (must be the (01*0)* group in the middle of the right-hand alternative; I think people tend to see the 01 as both bound by the *, rather than just the 1): means it's a useful example.
Oh, and the completeness proof for this regex matching multiples of three is fairly straightforward, once you have a minimal DFA for matching this regex. (In short: your minimal DFA has three states, each corresponding to a modulus of 3. 0 is the only accepting state, and you can prove by contradiction that all multiples of 3 end up in the 0 state.) Maybe I'll write it up when my profs stop assigning me papers. %-)
--
F
o
x
t
r
o
t
U
n
i
f
o
r
m
Found a typo in this node? /msg me
The hell with paco, vote for Erudil!
In reply to Re(2): Regex refresher
by FoxtrotUniform
in thread Regex refresher
by FoxtrotUniform
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |