History has it that Mr Wilde's response was, "You will Harvey, you will.". So, in this case, I guess I should simply say. "I will" :)
In C assert(true); could still be classed as an "assertion". The fact that the assertion is always true doesn't change that. perlre says
This zero-width assertion evaluate any embedded Perl code. It always s
+ucceeds,
so 'code block assertion' as a phrase to describe (?{ ... }) makes a certain amount of sense, to me at least.
And the (??{ ... }) is described as a "postponed regular subexpression".
Both are a bit wordy, but it would be nice to have terms for them, rather than needing to constantly use the notation? Maybe CBA and PP-RE?? Just a thought.
Examine what is said, not who speaks.
"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.