In fact, I try not to since it makes it harder to see room for improvement.
Only yesterday I noticed that a parser I'd written and which took about a page of Java code (yeah, right, the evil empire ;-) could actually reduced to something like 10 lines. The parser is a piece of code I wasn't especially proud of, but it did a good job. Had I been very proud of it, I might not have questioned the code and seen the shortcut.
Just my 2 cents, -gjb-
In reply to Re: Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone?
by gjb
in thread Stupid Emotional Programmer Attachment, anyone?
by talexb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |