Shared memory is not perfect (what is, come to that), but it allowed me on one project, years ago, to share "live, up-to-date" data between users at twelve different sites, and did so in a reliable, relatively stable way. I've not done much with threading, so my view may be prejudiced, but you would have to prove to me that threading would be a better solution on such a situation. I'd listen, but I'd listen with a cynical ear.
--
tbone1
Ain't enough 'O's in 'stoopid' to describe that guy.
- Dave "the King" Wilson
In reply to Re: Re: Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?
by tbone1
in thread Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?
by pg
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |