All the subs would have names in this situation but point conceded.
I'd hoped though that it would be reasonably clear that the reason for knowing the name was that I wanted to use a leading underscore to mark which handler subs should be publicised and which should not. That's the only reason - I was hoping a bit of Laziness (altering my naming convention) could save me coming up with any more elaborate means of maintaining a list of which ops should be advertised. ;-)
[Jon]
In reply to Re: •Re: Getting name of sub from a hash-based dispatch table?
by theguvnor
in thread Getting name of sub from a hash-based dispatch table?
by theguvnor
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |