This is the type of thing I had in mind, though you're right broquaint, it's a touch more... verbose than I'd been hoping for.
I guess this is Larry's waterbed theory at work - keeping the dispatch table structure simple just increases the work I have to do to determine some extra info from the sub names.
Thanks,
[Jon]
In reply to Re: Re: Getting name of sub from a hash-based dispatch table?
by theguvnor
in thread Getting name of sub from a hash-based dispatch table?
by theguvnor
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |