You've got a good point - is sheer volume worth the loss of quality? However, Borisz also pointed out two issues - 1) who's going to be the judge, and 2) what happens to if things break when supposedly poor-quality stuff is removed.

Perhaps a way around this would be to have two sections on CPAN - one for general modules, and another for modules that have been "certified" or otherwise validated or recognized. I don't know how practical that would be, but at least it would reduce the likelihood of modules being removed that someone relies on.

I didn't understand your comment about having a better implementation, but not being willing to contribute it to thisCPAN. Why not? I can't see that it would do you any harm. But of course, that's your decision...

---

---

Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!

Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.

Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.

Please read these before you post! —

• How do I compose an effective node title?
• How do I post a question effectively?
• Markup in the Monastery

Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:

a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr

You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)

	For:		Use:
	&		&
	<		&lt;
	>		&gt;
	[		&#91;
	]		&#93;

Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?

See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.