I said produce something. Not produce it and then promote it to the general public.
I did start to try and objectively try and consider whether anything had come out of Matt's script's that might be comsidered good. But then I realised that it would be pointless. Your question has nothing to do with what I said in the post to which you replied. Neither in isolation, nor in the context of the thread of which it is a part.
At this point, I am going to invoke Godwin's Law, as in my opinion, any reference to Matt's script's in the context of Perl programming is exactly equivalent.
In reply to Re^3: Make it good
by BrowserUk
in thread Make it good
by radiantmatrix
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |