Yeesh, that is one of my pet peeves. It may raise or suggest the question, but it certainly does not beg the question.

Of the 323,000 references to this phrase turned up by google, about 2 or 3 percent are people who have either unilaterally decided or have accepted the wisdom of some other, petitio principii-aware, usage nazi, that the only acceptable usage of this phrase is the classical rhetorical fallacy usage:

To beg the question means 'to assume the truth of the very point being raised in a question'.

The other 90%+, found in many highly respectable sources, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, The Times Literary Supplement, and even a hard-core academic journals, are usages similar to mine above, where the verb 'begs' is used as a substitute for the word 'entreat' or the phrase "ask earnestly for or of'.

  1. Language is a live, mutating entity and 'new' forms of usage are being adopted all the time.

    The only 'static' languages, are dead languages--like Latin.

  2. The classical usage is itself suspect.

    Let's try a little substitution--'beg' for 'assume':

    'to beg the truth of the very point being raised in a question'

    Does that make equivalent sense to the classical definition above? I think not.

    Or 'beg the point in a dispute' as meaning 'To take for granted without proof'?

    However, try:

    'That entreats the question...' or 'That implores the question "...", be asked. or 'That craves the question...'.

    I think those do!?

    Do you think it is possible that some ancient scholar made an error when translating from Latin or Greek to English or French at some point in history, and as a result, that nonsensical, idiomatic phrase has become enshrined in classical rhetorical teaching?

  3. Your suggested alternatives--"It may raise or suggest the question,..."--do not capture the essence of this usage.

    The implication of the phrase in the usage is not that the original text raised the question.

    It is that the original text didn't ask the question, when it probably should have asked.

    Whilst that is absolutely different from the classical usage, it does coincide with various other usages of the word 'beg' as a substitute for the word 'ask'.

    As in, 'I beg your forgiveness', or 'I beg to differ', or 'They begged the court's indulgance'.


Examine what is said, not who speaks.
Silence betokens consent.
Love the truth but pardon error.

In reply to Re^3: [OT] On Validating Email Addresses by BrowserUk
in thread On Validating Email Addresses by dws

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.