Retitling is a community process, people vote on the consideration.
Yes, but sometimes the community's decisions suck. There have been a few retitling considerations over the last few months that I consider pretty frivolous, despite there having been two calls for a more reasoned approach.
I would like especially to draw attention to borisz's observation: I noticed that the new title is in better english, but did not reflect my question anymore. That's just wrong.
And a janitor may well message you, but what if you are in a different time zone (and thus, asleep), or offline for a day or two?
I think sleepingsquirrel has every right to change the title back. And I suspect that the janitors simply won't bother the second time around. Besides, once the node is off the radar in a few days, the probability of it being further considered rapidly approaches zero.
update: s/dopey/frivolous/ The latter word expresses my opinion on the matter more accurately.
- another intruder with the mooring in the heart of the Perl
In reply to Re^2: Appealing a consideration?
by grinder
in thread Appealing a consideration?
by sleepingsquirrel
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |