It's so much less evil, in fact, that it's actually allowed by strict.That's probably the most evil statement in this entire thread. It suggests that 'strict' is this omniscient, benign being that flawlessly decides what's good for you and what not.
It's not. Sometimes disabling strict is the right thing to do (because it allows you to do something that isn't otherwise possible, or it allows you write easier to understand code). Pleasing 'use strict;' should not be a design goal. Of course using "use strict;" is usually a good idea.
In reply to Re^4: Am I evil for doing this?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Am I evil for doing this?
by Whitehawke
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |