As consistent with my personality, I always attempt to find patterns to simplify things -- and I noticed the same pattern that you have.

I'm of the personal opinion that many people don't read the nodes about questions that they don't know about, and/or don't vote in that section as they're not qualified to determine if it's a good response or not. Philosophical questions, on the other hand, is more a way of stating your opinions, and so you can vote someone up on the appearance of being a good idea, without knowing if it's technically accurate.

I'm basing this mostly on my postings in various SOAP nodes on Perl Monks -- they never get significantly upvoted. If I answer something which I find to be quote minor in some of the more-read topics (mySQL, CGI, OO, etc.), it's likely to get as many upvotes as in the less-read categories that take much more thought and effort.

It's also possible that the technical threads don't tend to get re-read as often. I know that if I read something, and saw that someone had already given a good answer, and I thought it was resolved, I don't tend to go back and re-read it. For the philisophical threads, there is no true resolution, so I will go and check to see what new comments have been added (and thus, I'm more likely to upvote posts that were significantly after the node's inception)

I think the only thing that we can really show is that the number of votes for a node have too many variables involved to be just a measure of the overall quality. Likewise, XP is only an indicator of how much XP you have.

In reply to Re: The purpose of voting by jhourcle
in thread The purpose of voting by Gekitsuu

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.