Rather than thinking of this as an any to any comparison with the exponential growth that can result,designate one machine as the 'master' and have it send it's table to the other 6 (n) machines, that simply update/replace their copy from the master.
No comparison necessary. A straight delete and replace of the table is going to be much quicker than a (multi-way) comparison.
In reply to Re: Comparing tables over multiple servers
by BrowserUk
in thread Comparing tables over multiple servers
by mnlight
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |