It has the misfortune of working correctly, as opposed to ref or UNIVERSAL::isa().
Oh I do agree that the number of times that you'd actually want to use reftype, outside pure curiosity and debugging, is pretty darn tiny. However, on the odd occasion when I do need it I find it fortunate to have something that does exactly the job I want and is named properly :-)
In reply to Re^4: Is there a way to find out what kind of ref an object is? (isa)
by adrianh
in thread Is there a way to find out what kind of ref an object is?
by johnnywang
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |