just to bring closure on this-- I wasn't necessarily trying to argue that there was a "right way" or "wrong way" so much as saying that there is ambiguity about whether
for $scalar (@array) would cause <FILE> to be read in its entirety, or line-by-line. there are many cases where perl looks at lvalue to determine what to do on the right side, and this seems like just such a case at first blush.
$line = <FILE>; # reads one line from FILE;
@lines = <FILE>; # slurps up the whole thing.
for $line (<FILE>) ... # which of the above applies?
The thing that really makes the visual assessment ambiguous is the placement of $line in the for statement, which is the source of the perceived ambiguity.
Granted, I only saw it as the scalar form, and I do realize that it'd be more like saying
for $line (@lines)
which clarifies how perl is reading it (and thus, what happens with <FILE>), but seeing both ways now makes the ambiguity more understandable.
Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
Please read these before you post! —
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
- a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
| |
For: |
|
Use: |
| & | | & |
| < | | < |
| > | | > |
| [ | | [ |
| ] | | ] |
Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.