It sounds like what you're saying is that you've identified and learned the core set of functions and operators that you need to use on a daily basis to get your work done. If those 64 functions are all you need, then thank Perl for being so powerful. :)
I think we all know our own core set, determined (or at least influenced) by the projects we've been on. I think most people (including myself) tend to learn new things as new needs arise, but in addition I try to read documentation as I have time so I'm familiar with the capabilities of the language even if I don't remember the specifics (see also Zaxo's comment to this effect).
I don't think there is anything wrong with knowing only a subset of a language. In fact, I would guess very few people (i.e., the true gurus) really know all Perl has to offer. If the post you mentioned in the OP* opened your eyes to a new function and inspired you to browse through the docs again, good! I hope you enjoy the the journey. :)
*FWIW, I am not only familiar with pos, but I also used it for nearly an identical purpose as mdunnbass (searching a genomic sequence for matches to a query sequence).
In reply to Re: functional functions
by bobf
in thread functional functions
by punkish
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |