Really. That's great. I'm not sure how Parrot relates to what I've said in this thread? Nor even to anything I've ever said about Parrot?
It's simple. A person can talk and talk and then complain about how no one jumps to write code for said person, or a person can write code. I choose the latter.
But then again...if it is possible to create Parrot code, but not to create a thread to run that Parrot code, then could that be an indication that threads on Parrot is going to be another tack-it-on-later solution?
That really depends on what you mean by "tack-it-on-later". The concurrency PDD is still unfinished, and, as such, not completely implemented. Here's your chance to suggest a better threading model than ithreads or pthreads.
In reply to Re^7: Slow evolution of Perl = Perl is a closed Word
by chromatic
in thread Slow evolution of Perl = Perl is a closed Word
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |