I think what Corion is implying is that since you're squashing the second level keys to sequential indexen you could just keep them in an arrayref instead of a hash, and the element index would be the ID naturally (which makes sense; you'd just build a new parallel copy by walking over each sub-hash's values sorted by the key and push them into the new array).
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
In reply to Re^2: Changing key values, i.e. renumbering keys?
by Fletch
in thread Changing key values, i.e. renumbering keys?
by PerlKitten
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |