Why not, what's the problem? I've been using them like this for ages without any issues I could remember. Resolution of symlinks is a rather low-level kernel feature, which should be handled transparently by any modern version of Unix.
PS: anyone interested in how it's done in Linux may want to study the function load_script in linux/fs/binfmt_script.c, which calls open_exec (linux/fs/exec.c), which in turn eventually branches (via path_lookup_open) into the generic path lookup and symlink resolution code implemented in linux/fs/namei.c.
In reply to Re^3: Can I write a transparent shell wrapper to start the correct build of Perl?
by almut
in thread Can I write a transparent shell wrapper to start the correct build of Perl?
by thparkth
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |