To get back to the OT, I recommend it this way.
To get back to the OT, I stick with my original recommendation. I had already considered the alternatives before posting it and found them to leak memory and/or needlessly convoluted.
Reader, take your pick. If you bless a hash to make an object, you have no reason to use lexicals for inner subs.
In reply to Re^13: sub fuction inside sub functioin?
by ikegami
in thread sub fuction inside sub functioin?
by deewanagan
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |