Answer Hazy. Ask Again Later

A little more than ten years ago, I had a somewhat similar choice. Fresh out of college, I was vying for entry-level (support) positions with two companies. Company A was local, a market leader in many categories. Company B was one of their fiercest competitors in certain areas and located some place I'd never been before.

I received an offer from Company B while Company A was still dithering about. I had to decide between taking the offer in hand or hoping that a second one would appear. I took it, partly because it existed and partly because it would involve a number of new experiences. (The second offer did come through as I was packing the U-Haul to move to the new location.)

I did well at Company B, moving quickly through the ranks until I had another choice. Accept a promotion into R&D to help develop the product we were working or one into Product Management to help lead that development. I chose the latter. A month later, I was laid off as Company B restructured, in part because they'd not been able to sucessfully compete with Company A. (None of the developers were laid off at that time.)

I was devastated, in part because I'd allowed a lot of my personal sense of self to be wrapped up in the successes I'd enjoyed at Company B.

If I'd waited for and accepted Company A's offer, I would likely have far more money than I do now, for their stock has performed admirably and they've only recently run into certain, well-publicized problems.

In looking back, I stand by my original decision for two main reasons:

  1. As many of you know, I have a love for live theatre. While working at Company B, I was able to heavily participate in the local community theatre, doing some thirty shows in 3-1/2 years. I do not believe I would have been allowed to indulge my avocation as heavily had I waited for Company A.

  2. Through a bizarre series of coincidences (which I'll spare you the details of) related to Company B and the product I was working on, I met the woman who would later consent to be my wife.

    Without getting overly mushy, I believe she was the right person for me and I do not believe I would have met her if I'd joined Company A. Similarly, I don't believe that I'd have the pleasure of our daughter's presence in my life.

I believe that, as developers, we should take pride in our work and should strive to use craftsmanship as a guiding principle. That said, I also believe that:

In short, be a Monk: Take pride in your work and your accomplishments, but not to the detriment of what really matters.

--f


In reply to Re: Permanence and Programming as a "craft" by footpad
in thread Permanence and Programming as a "craft" by Hero Zzyzzx

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.