But for some other stuff, I like where you're going with it. Think about being in a prescriptive setting. Connoted but not defined. I'm big on docs to separate defined behavior from incidental behavior. Calling the observation something other than "defined", as being done for referenced posts talking about a language "defined" by its one implementation, is something I like.
In reply to Re^5: The behavior is [sic] undefined
by John M. Dlugosz
in thread The behavior is [sic] undefined
by John M. Dlugosz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |