Hudson is not bound to a specific programming language. Given that you organization already uses Hudson why deviate? Hudson is rapidly gaining in popularity and for good reason. It's easy to set-up and extensible. Tons of free plugins. See for a Perl example: automating Perl deployments with Hudson. You can add automatic testing, automatic code analysis, produce metrics for QA etc etc. Of course you can spend weeks/months comparing the different tools... But, as usual, it all starts with your requirements.
Cheers
Harry
In reply to Re: Continuous integration tools for perl
by dHarry
in thread Continuous integration tools for perl
by andreas1234567
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |