ActiveState and others provides binaries via ppm, primarily for Windows. Unix distros provide binaries via their package system. You can do quite a bit without a compiler and without testing.
But say you do need a compiler, perhaps because you want a module that hasn't been tested and packaged for you yet. Perl provides a very easy installation mechanism in the form of cpan. On Windows, it will even automatically install a compiler for you if you need one!
I can't imagine a more refined system.
In reply to Re: Why is it in some other popular languages fewer steps and potential issues when installing libraries no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done
by ikegami
in thread Why are other popular languages very different from Perl when installing libraries, e.g. no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done
by hermida
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |