DOM may be terrible in some ways, but it's not LibXML's fault for following it. People expect that nearly any widely used language out there will have a DOM parser. That way, we can all suffer equally.
I suspect what you want is XML::Simple.
"There is no shame in being self-taught, only in not trying to learn in the first place." -- Atrus, Myst: The Book of D'ni.
In reply to Re: XML::LibXML - WHAR HASH TREES WHAR?!
by hardburn
in thread XML::LibXML - WHAR HASH TREES WHAR?!
by SineSwiper
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |