True. But then all I did was demonstrate that: for(;;) compiled the same as while(1) and the latter is clearer.
Oh. And then attempted to refute the ridiculous notion that while(1) then "gets optimised to for(;;)".
But that's just a side show instigated upon one man's misinterpretation of his own mistake, and his subsequent 'definitive' misassertions based upon it.
In reply to Re^6: Memory leak!
by BrowserUk
in thread Memory leak!
by joeymac
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |