No. Perl's rand() is documented to be completely repeatable when given the same starting point (see srand). So the number of strings possible using just rand() is bound by roughly 2 ** (the number random bits) or, more correctly, the number of effectively different srand() values.
Update: And every implementation that I've seen uses a simple LCPRNG (Linear Congruential Psuedo-Random Number Generator). So each has a fixed number of possible values and it will simply cycle through those in the exact same order each time if you actually call it 2**$bits times. The number of effectively different seed values is called the "period".
Update: Oh, forgot to mention that some implementations intentionally use only a subset of the (upper) bits so the period can often be much higher than 2**$bits. For example, a period of 2**32 is quite common while many such implementations only use 16 bits of each result. And I'm not completely sure, in such a case, whether Perl Config reports that as 16 or 32 "random bits".
Note: Just FYI, the above two updates were posted within a few minutes of the original submission (and thus nearly 2 hours before the first reply).
- tye
In reply to Re^3: How likely is rand() to repeat? (srand)
by tye
in thread How likely is rand() to repeat?
by desertrat
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |