I always got the impression Java the language was copyrighted, based on the hoops I had to jump through to get a copy to install. Maybe I was mistaken. But doesn't the phrase "owner of Java" imply that?
I wonder if the fact that it's Java will strengthen Google's case, because Java is its API. You can do a lot with Perl without ever using a module, and its use of sigils and statement modifiers give it a look all its own. There's such a think as Perlish syntax. But Java without its classes, if there's anything left at all, is just wordy C.
Aaron B.
My Woefully Neglected Blog, where I occasionally mention Perl.
In reply to Re: Copyright on languages
by aaron_baugher
in thread Copyright on languages
by ikegami
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |