Yes, especially since it's not. :)
Consider:
0.00000 ... 00001 > 0.00000 ... 000009
Now if A > B and A = 0 than 0 > B so
0 > 0.00000 ... 000009
and we've found a positive number which is strictly
less than zero.<blink><blink><twitch>
The problem comes from specifying a last digit since one can always specify one more after that which isn't zero and get a 'really' different number.
In reply to Re: Re:(jepri) .999999... == 1? (Somewhat OT)
by scott
in thread .999999... == 1? (Somewhat OT)
by Sherlock
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |