Re^5: How to multiprocess in Win32? (explained)

"why doesn't ActiveState implement something like this?"..

Could you explain what you mean? system 1, ... works fine on ActiveState?

Examine what is said, not who speaks.

"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"Think for yourself!" - Abigail
"Memory, processor, disk in that order on the hardware side. Algorithm, algorithm, algorithm on the code side." - tachyon

Comment on Re^5: How to multiprocess in Win32? (explained) Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: How to multiprocess in Win32? (explained) by wolfger (Deacon) on Oct 26, 2004 at 18:20 UTC
Could you explain what you mean? system 1, ... works fine on ActiveState? I meant your workaround for fork, not just "system (1,". Considering their current implementation of fork is so broken, it seems like they could implement something similar. -- Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it - even if I have said it - unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense. (Buddha)	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^6: How to multiprocess in Win32? (explained)
by wolfger (Deacon) on Oct 26, 2004 at 18:20 UTC

Could you explain what you mean? system 1, ... works fine on ActiveState?

Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it - even if I have said it - unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
(Buddha)

[reply]

Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it - even if I have said it - unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.(Buddha)

Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it - even if I have said it - unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
(Buddha)