in reply to Re^2: Why isn't C<use strict> the default?
in thread Why isn't C<use strict> the default?
I also agree that for a lot of programmers, whether they are newbies or more seasoned, more BDSM in the language would be a good benefit for them. Not just "use strict", but also a strong type system and a far more rigid syntax. It'll improve the quality of many programmers programs. But you shouldn't do that by changing the language - the programmers who need more structure need to change language.
|
|---|