in reply to Learning the Deeper Secrets of Perl
Of course, this doesn't help you with broader design issues, and if you convert a poorly-thought-out script into perl, you get poorly-thought-out perl. Heck, even some well-thought out shell scripts might ignore perl-only idiomatic solutions, but you get the idea: use something that's been created as a proof-of-concept, and mirror that functionality in perl. Redesign if you deem it necessary.
Any *N*X box likely has a wealth of examples to draw from; and books on shell scripting should have shorter examples to copy. I'm sure googling will find you even more.
(This supplements the "write something to scratch your personal itch" line of advice I often hear; sometimes you don't even know what itches until you get further out into the forest.)
Something worth thinking about.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: Learning the Deeper Secrets of Perl
by radiantmatrix (Parson) on Jan 27, 2005 at 14:45 UTC |