Re^53: Hallelujah [was: Why is EO undefined?]

Geez. You mean that the money I just shelled out having the milk I put in my tea analysed for narcotic contamination was wasted :).

Seriously, thankyou for posting that. It get's extremely disconcerting when you are so sure that what you're saying makes at least some sense, when all around you are pounding on you. That tiny piece of positive indication that I am not necessarially, totally barking mad, is much appreciated.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco.

Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?

Comment on Re^53: Hallelujah [was: Why is EO undefined?]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^54: Hallelujah by jdporter (Paladin) on Jul 14, 2006 at 16:09 UTC
Definitely not in Oz... We're building the house of the future together.	[reply]
Re^55: Hallelujah by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jul 15, 2006 at 00:15 UTC
... but maybe in Oz. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal? "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply] [d/l]