Re^2: Is it a pragma or a module?

in reply to Re: Is it a pragma or a module?
in thread Is it a pragma or a module?

halley: I like your explanation, although I'd add that it needs to be delivered with core perl. Otherwize, all modules using source filters would become additional pragmata.

Best regards,
perl -e "s>>*F>e=>y)\*martinF)stronat)=>print,print v8.8.8.32.11.32"

Comment on Re^2: Is it a pragma or a module?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is it a pragma or a module? by halley (Prior) on Dec 18, 2006 at 00:40 UTC
I don't agree that being in the core perl distribution is a trait of pragmatic modules. See my use deprecated; node. -- `[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]`	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom