Re^3: searching for strings

I have found a few steph_bow needs to weigh in on.

Agreed. That said, the test set provided is amazingly complete given how concise it is.

There is nothing accidental about either the choice of sample, or its ordering. A lot of thought went into its provision.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re^3: searching for strings

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: searching for strings by shmem (Chancellor) on Aug 06, 2007 at 18:08 UTC
A lot of thought went into its provision. Why do I think "homework!" all of a sudden? :-) --shmem _($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ / /\_¯/(q / ---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."· ");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}	[reply]