Re^4: Some thoughts around the "is Perl code maintainable" discussion

> One thing that is occasionally annoying is the
> confusion between "multi line" anonymous hashrefs and
> code blocks: to cope with that I often put parentheses
> instead, that I substitute with curlies later. Not
> terribly hard, but... well, annoying.

In my extensions to cperl-mode for Perl6 syntax (and here) I made a Perl6 like distinction between hashes and blocks in a way that no whitespace is allowed before the curlies of hashes. With that the distinction of hashes and blocks generally works better.

I always use my enhanced variant of cperl-mode also for Perl5 code due to features like this, so maybe you also give it a try.

Comment on Re^4: Some thoughts around the "is Perl code maintainable" discussion

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Some thoughts around the "is Perl code maintainable" discussion by blazar (Canon) on Aug 16, 2007 at 14:54 UTC
I always use my enhanced variant of cperl-mode also for Perl5 code due to features like this, so maybe you also give it a try. Thank you very much, and good to let people know, for all the others experiencing a similar problem. But you wrongly assumed I use something a .el thingie could run on: however do not fear, I'm not in "the" other camp. Amongst the two contendants I chose a third beast... :-)	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^5: Some thoughts around the "is Perl code maintainable" discussion
by blazar (Canon) on Aug 16, 2007 at 14:54 UTC

I always use my enhanced variant of cperl-mode also for Perl5 code due to features like this, so maybe you also give it a try.

Thank you very much, and good to let people know, for all the others experiencing a similar problem. But you wrongly assumed I use something a .el thingie could run on: however do not fear, I'm not in "the" other camp. Amongst the two contendants I chose a third beast... :-)

[reply]