in reply to Re: A reproducible shuffle? ("stable shuffle")
in thread A reproducible shuffle? ("stable shuffle")

Well, it's not just one random order I need, but some arbitrary number that increases with time. Also, the items in the order could be changed or added to. Re^2: A reproducible shuffle? ("stable shuffle") explains better.

As for wanting to keep srand() intact, I have other code that can occur in the same page load (web application) that needs a random value (or at least a good psuedorandom value).

  • Comment on Re^2: A reproducible shuffle? ("stable shuffle")