Re^4: Using a stored condition

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Using a stored condition by shmem (Chancellor) on Mar 02, 2008 at 23:44 UTC
Am I doing something wrong here? Yes. ETOOLAZY: `my $aa=1,$bb=1,$cc=1,$dd=1;` [download] That's equivalent to `my $aa=1; $bb=1; $cc=1; $dd=1;` [download] Only $aa is declared as lexical. Even parens don't work, since you can't declare an assignment - you declare variables. But that's lazy enough: `my ($aa, $bb, $cc, $dd); $aa = $bb = $cc = $dd = 1;` [download] --shmem _($_=" "x(1<<5)."?\n".q·/)Oo. G°\ / /\_¯/(q / ---------------------------- \__(m.====·.(_("always off the crowd"))."· ");sub _{s./.($e="'Itrs `mnsgdq Gdbj O`qkdq")=~y/"-y/#-z/;$e.e && print}	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^6: Using a stored condition by blazar (Canon) on Mar 03, 2008 at 00:12 UTC
Am I doing something wrong here? Yes. ETOOLAZY: `my $aa=1,$bb=1,$cc=1,$dd=1;` [download] That's equivalent to `my $aa=1; $bb=1; $cc=1; $dd=1;` [download] Only $aa is declared as lexical. Even parens don't work, since you can't declare an assignment - you declare variables. I personally believe ENOTLAZYENOUGH: `my ($aa, $bb, $cc, $dd) = (1) x 4;` [download] (Which of course you knew, but may be worth pointing out for the benefit of the OP.) `--` If you can't understand the incipit, then please check the IPB Campaign.	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^7: Using a stored condition by jdporter (Paladin) on Mar 03, 2008 at 01:34 UTC
Good. But also: `$_++ for my( $aa, $bb, $cc, $dd );` [download]	[reply] [d/l]