in reply to RFC: Monastery Markup Introduction

Depending on what you read, where you were taught or how you write your own CSS; <i>...</i> and <b>...</b> are to some degree interchangable with <em>...</em> and <strong>...</strong> respectivly.

YMMV

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Monastery Markup Introduction
by ww (Archbishop) on Mar 09, 2008 at 14:19 UTC

    You are correct, within the context of the conditions in your initial clause; in fact, one of my (test) browsers renders <i>...</i> text in boldface, pointing up the fact that Gavin's reply below is a more precise characterization.

    For reference, however, this, from w3c (at http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/present/graphics.html#h-15.2.1):

    Rendering of font style elements depends on the user agent. The following is an informative description only.

    TT: Renders as teletype or monospaced text.
    I: Renders as italic text style.
    B: Renders as bold text style.
    BIG: Renders text in a "large" font.
    SMALL: Renders text in a "small" font.
    STRIKE and S: Deprecated. Render strike-through style text.
    U: Deprecated. Renders underlined text.
    (Emphasis in original; the draft .html 5 language is different.)

    You will notice that w3c deprecates the last two, whereas PM does NOT (though I suspect you will find a consensus here against the use of U). Further, since you mention CSS, the word "style" in the w3c statement is NOT a reference to CSS.

    And -- at this time -- the specialized sub- and super-set of .html 4.01 used in the Monastery does NOT accept .css entered in an input box.

    To demonstrate:

    <p style="font-style: italic;">This will NOT render as italic.</p>

    This will NOT render as italic.

    In fact, if you have "enforce" turned on and "reporting" set high in Display Settings (see above), you will see the second <p style="font-style: italic;"> highlighted (in my case, in a light grey) as non-conformant.

    Of course, you can impose your own preferences on rendering by supplying .css in your personal style-sheet, but there's no assurance that other readers will have it rendered as you do.

Re^2: RFC: Monastery Markup Introduction
by Gavin (Archbishop) on Mar 09, 2008 at 11:55 UTC
    I think that they are interchangeable to some extent.

    The difference is in how they are interpreted by different browsers and to a greater extent speech programs and I think Braille bars for the visually impaired etc.