in reply to Re^3: 5.10 shows uninitialized $@ warning
in thread 5.10 shows uninitialized $@ warning

Your code never gets to execute the eval, much less to using $@ afterwards, so you couldn't possibly get the a warning from using $@. That's like saying "I can't replicate the fact that you got 'foo' on the screen, but ignore the fact that I didn't actually call a print function."

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: 5.10 shows uninitialized $@ warning
by syphilis (Archbishop) on May 16, 2008 at 15:28 UTC
    Your code never gets to execute the eval

    Bullshit - under 5.10 at least - and whether or not it gets executed under perl 5.8 is irrelevant in terms of the original post. (It's the 5.10 behaviour that the op is interested in.)

    Let's just agree to have our respective lawyers sort this out tomorrow.

    Cheers,
    Rob

      whether or not it gets executed under perl 5.8 is irrelevant in terms of the original post

      True. Forgot about that. A better example wouldn't be so confusing.

      There be only camels about