in reply to Re: Discourage Trolling (effects)
in thread Discourage Trolling

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Discourage Trolling (effects)
by marto (Cardinal) on May 19, 2008 at 15:01 UTC
    "I felt that the post marto made was completely unreasonable and needed an answer."

    Really? You have replied to my question but rather than answer any of the points I raised decided to make (yet more) abusive comments (validating part of my post, thanks). So what are you claiming to have answered? You seem be claiming that you have provided a valid answer to the points I raised when in actual fact you have, rather characteristically, ignored the post you are replying to.

    My post was not off topic in the slightest, I think that you have either not read it, are incapable of understanding it or that you are just a troll, like many people seem to believe.
      You're in a thread about not replying to trolls, do you think you might want to avoid replying to trolls?

      Do you think a well reasoned argument will work this time?

      grep
      One dead unjugged rabbit fish later...
      You might want to check out Do Not Feed the Trolls!!! There is a CSS technique described in that thread that you can use to hide posts from specific users. It's always easier to avoid the bait when you cannot see it....